Not much new here for me -- except for one key insight that blew my head open! |
I’ve read plenty of books about color theory. Long before I
began sketching, my work with fibers, beads and abstract collage depended
on color as the primary element, so I spent a lot of time studying and
experimenting with color. Most of these books had one thing in common: They
were written for painters. The lessons – how to mix primaries to create
secondaries, for example – involved pigments suspended in liquid binders or
solvents, also known as paints.
One of those basic lessons was that mixing either three cool
primaries or three warm primaries will result in vibrant, cohesive palettes. If
you mix warm and cool primaries together, your result might be lovely subdued
hues – but more likely mud. Since I was working mostly with media that didn’t
involve mixing paints, I learned the mixing rules mostly as theory (though it
was an important way to learn concepts such as color temperature and intensity,
which apply to any medium).
Make your own color wheel. |
Years later when I began sketching and dabbling in
watercolors, I tried to use what I had remembered about color theory to mix
paints, but I was having enough trouble learning the pigment/water balance and
never really got around to mixing colors. Eventually I switched to colored
pencils, which I found to be far more forgiving than watercolors.
Fast-forward to last winter when I became interested in
studying primary triads with colored pencils (surely you remember all
those apples I sketched?). I recalled what I had learned from those color
theory books and even went back to a few to refresh my memory. For most of
those experiments, I applied the basic principle of staying within warms or
within cools to create harmonious triads. (Although sometimes I deliberately mixed warms and cools, just to see what would happen.) Yet somehow I
stumbled on surprises – mixes that I had expected to be vibrant were more on
the dull side. Or haphazard triads turned out beautifully. My results seemed hit or miss, despite what I thought I knew about color theory. Still, I
enjoyed my studies immensely, even when I ended up with mud, because each triad
taught me something about how colored pencil hues interact with each other.
Lots of exercises like this. |
As I thumbed through the book, I saw that the bulk of it is
about the color theory that I’d already learned. It also contains many pages of
color blending and color-wheel-making exercises – the kinds of exercises I had
my fill of when I took Suzanne Brooker’s colored pencil class several
years ago. I thought the book was going to be a waste, until I started reading
the introduction – and the proverbial light bulb suddenly switched on over my
head:
According to Lindenberger, the traditional color wheel based
on the three primaries – red, yellow, blue – relies on pigments that paints and
other media are made of. But mixing those primaries using colored pencils gave
her a lot of trouble. She got unexpected muddy results just like I did. Ultimately,
after much trial and error, she found that the best colored pencil triad came
from Process Red (994), Canary Yellow (916) and True Blue (903, all Prismacolor
Premier numbers) – which are not the typical red, yellow and blue we think of when
we make a color wheel. In fact, they are much closer to the magenta, yellow and
cyan used by the color printing process, which sprays layers of ink, one over
the other. “If you have a color printer,” she wrote, “you will notice that the
magenta, yellow and cyan inks are almost a dead match for the Prismacolor
Premier Process Red, Canary Yellow and True Blue pencil colors.”
Geek note: My triad is made of three generations of Prismacolors! |
This made so much sense! Unlike paint pigments that are blended
together with their liquid binders, colored pencil layers are optically mixed
like transparent glazes – and like printing inks. Eureka! It felt like the author
was explaining what I myself had observed during last winter’s triad experiments,
except I didn’t understand enough about it to articulate or formulate what I
was observing. The light bulb that snapped on was worth the price of the book!
I went back to my primary triadic sketches and picked out
the ones I had favored (below). In each case, the “red” I had used was closer to
magenta, carmine or pink rather than a true red – yet when mixed with a warm
yellow, the result was a vibrant red. The blues I used varied more, and I didn’t
try many close to cyan. But the luminous pear I had sketched on Dec. 23 (third sketch below) included
Prismacolor watercolor pencil True Blue (2903, which is the watercolor version
of 903) and Carmine (2920). The yellows used in my favored triads were close to
canary. (It’s easier to see the triad hues used if you look at the mixing
swatch rather than the sketch.)
1/6/20 Winsor Newton watercolor pencils (Carmine, Sunflower, Midnight) |
1/23/20 vintage General's Kimberly (705, 713, 703) |
12/23/19 vintage Prismacolor watercolor (Carmine, Sunburst Yellow, True Blue) |
Of course, I had to try sketching an apple using the Prismacolor
triad that Lindenberger recommended. The vibrancy is especially apparent in the
secondaries (orange, green, violet) that result from Process Red, Canary Yellow
and True Blue in my mixing swatch.
It’s satisfying when a book explains something I was on the
verge of understanding on my own – but I needed that additional insight to fully
understand it. Maybe next winter I’ll make a new set of triadic apples – this
time looking specifically for variations of the hues Lindenberger recommends.
I love when you have that "lightbulb" moment, and you almost yell "YES!!" It seems you had it.
ReplyDeleteI did yell "yes!" out loud! ;-)
Delete