These are the papers I've been testing with graphite. |
A few weeks ago I concluded that my
long-time favorite sketchbook paper, 140-pound Canson XL watercolor paper, wasn’t going to work with the graphite
techniques I’ve been practicing since I learned them from Eduardo Bajzek in Porto. While it’s ideal for my needs with
water-soluble colored pencils, ink, brush pens and markers, the cold press
finish is too toothy for graphite, especially when it’s smudged.
Test Criteria
Since
then, I’ve been experimenting with a bunch of different types of paper I have
on hand. The paper must be satisfactory with graphite and also satisfactory
with other media I use most often. To be satisfactory with graphite, the surface
must be smooth enough to smudge with an even tone and erase easily (two essential
techniques with Eduardo’s method). To be satisfactory with my other favorite
media, the paper must be able to withstand at least a light spritzing of water (a
technique I employ often with water-soluble colored pencils). In fact, ability to
withstand moisture is also a requirement with graphite because the spritzed-on fixative I’ve been
using causes thin papers to buckle irreparably.
Contenders
Clockwise
from upper left, they are:
Results
The
short story: No single paper is going to make me happy with all the media I
want to use in the way that 140-pound Canson XL made me happy for years – until
I introduced graphite into the mix.
The
long story: Many papers that are excellent with graphite make me unhappy (some very unhappy) with most of the other media I like to use.
At
least two papers were easy to reject. The first was the Derwent sketch pad that
I received at the symposium and used in Eduardo’s workshop. While its tooth is acceptable
with graphite, it’s difficult to erase and too thin for use with any liquid
media. I was also quick to reject Borden & Riley vellum, which is also too light
to use with anything but dry media. It is the only paper I tested that did not
accommodate Faber-Castell Pitt Artist Pens;
the ink sunk straight through the sheet and continued to bleed onto the next
page.
The
Bristol vellum papers, with an acceptable tooth, are more difficult to erase,
so I rejected them, too.
9/3/18 Strathmore Bristol vellum |
My
favorite papers with graphite – especially with the smudging/erasing techniques
– are Bristol smooth (both Strathmore and Canson) and Stillman & Birn
Epsilon. The surfaces on all three are pleasantly smooth but have just enough texture
to take graphite beautifully. They also erase easily.
Strathmore Bristol smooth |
Canson Bristol smooth |
I prefer the texture of cold press paper with water-soluble colored pencils. |
The
big – huge! – issue with all of the above graphite favorites is that they are
not sized appropriately for wet media, even if they are sufficiently heavy in
weight. (All are about 100 pound in weight, which buckles when wet but flattens
out adequately after drying.) For example, dry colored pencil applies as well
as graphite does, but when I spritz or brush water-soluble colored pencil
pigments with water to activate them, the pigments do not spread as easily, and
the hues seem less vibrant. In addition, once the activated pigments dry, the
paper surface changes in a way that additional layers of colored pencil do not
apply well. This is a major drawback in terms of achieving intense hues with
watercolor pencils.
In
most of my watercolor pencil sketches, I also miss the texture that I enjoy with
Canson XL’s 140-pound paper.
An equally
disappointing result is the way water-soluble inks perform on Bristol smooth papers.
On my favorite Canson XL watercolor paper, I am accustomed to easily shading
such inks with a quick swipe of the waterbrush. A few days ago at the farmers’
market, I was using a water-soluble Kuretake Fudegokochi brush pen to sketch people sitting in the grass. As is my habit, I grabbed a waterbrush to wash the
lines – and the lines barely moved. I kept squeezing out more water, thinking
that the brush was dry, but to no avail. I finally took out a Pitt marker to
add shading.
I couldn't get the water-soluble Fudegokochi ink to move on Strathmore Bristol smooth. |
Here’s
a comparison of Canson XL 140-pound watercolor paper and Strathmore Bristol
smooth with a few favorite water-soluble media (Note: The third sample on each
paper is mislabeled; it should be ArtGraf water-soluble carbon, not graphite):
Strathmore Bristol smooth |
Canson XL 140-pound watercolor paper |
Solution?
These
are my options:
1. The
most obvious solution seems the simplest: I always stitch my own sketchbook
signatures anyway, so why don’t I simply bind together a mix of papers – some
for graphite, some for everything else? It’s one of the biggest benefits of hand
binding – I can use any papers I want. It does sound simple – except that I
like to keep my sketches chronological, and how do I know which medium I want
to use when I get to a particular type of paper in the signature?
2. If
I’m willing to give up chronology, I could carry two signatures – one with my
favorite Canson watercolor paper; one with a Bristol smooth – which would be
less confusing and preferable to paging through a signature of mixed papers to
find the appropriate page. But that would mean carrying more paper.
3. I
could simplify and lighten my bag significantly by choosing only one media type
and therefore need only one paper type. (Not a chance.)
4. I
could do a variation of No. 3 but only
for a limited time, such as the minimal sketch kit challenge I gave myself last winter. A plan like that would enable
me to keep my sketches chronological and
have the benefit of lightening my load.
Hmmm.
Now
that I’ve embraced fall, I
absolutely must have color in my bag through
November, so I’ll be switching back to 140-pound Canson XL at least for that duration.
Maybe I’ll also carry a thin signature of Bristol smooth for occasional
graphite sketches and see if I can tolerate the broken chronology. Then during
the gray winter months, perhaps I’ll go on an all-graphite diet.
No comments:
Post a Comment