8/13/18 Green Lake (graphite) |
When
my niece was young and studying both piano and violin, her father (my brother,
an engineer) made an interesting observation. He said that while piano is
digital (discrete units expressed in a scale), violin is analog (a continuous physical
variable). It’s an intriguing metaphor that has stayed with me.
8/9/18 Summit & Boren (fountain pen and Pitt marker) |
You
know how fickle I am about my sketching materials. My first several years, I
used ink line and watercolor. The past few years, “mixed media” has been the
only accurate term for what I use. In a single sketch, I might use colored
pencils, ink, Pitt markers and a brush pen together. It’s not so much that I want
to use so many things at once. It’s more that certain media do things faster or
more easily than others, so I grab the tool that gets the job done for the
subject matter I’ve chosen or the length of time I have.
Having
sketched with a wide variety of materials, I recently started thinking about the
difference between “digital” art media (and here I’m using the term
metaphorically, not in reference to iPad sketching) and analog media. Markers (like
my favorite Faber-Castell Pitt Artist Pens) strike me as very digital tools – either on or off. When you make a
mark with one, it’s a solid, discrete unit (like 1 or 0). Once put in place, it
will not change. Unless you have fast fingertips like Don Colley, who can smear Pitt ink quickly enough before it dries
that it can blend or have a slight gradation, marker marks tend to look streaky.
Markers come in handy when I want a flat, solid surface, like shading the side
of a building. But without Don’s fingers, I find it almost impossible to give soft,
rounded shading to a person’s face, for example, with a Pitt.
The
past couple of years as I’ve gotten to know colored pencils and graphite
pencils better, I have come to realize that what I love most about both is their
potential for endless, seamless gradation. They are the quintessential analog
material. If you look at a pencil mark under a microscope, you’ll see that it’s
made of a bunch of particles of varying sizes that adhere to the paper’s surface.
The mark is a continuous physical variable, like a violin note. By smudging or applying
more, a pencil mark can be changed almost indefinitely. Maybe it’s just my
training in landscape drawing (with
Suzanne Brooker at Gage) that
influences this opinion, but pencils seem to be made for soft or organic
subject matter.
I love your graphite sketch of the lake! Is there a way to incorporate just a hint of color into these sketches? Just musing out loud I guess!
ReplyDeleteI too love this sketch, but am intrigued by Cathy's musing. Would it work with Derwent Graphitint pencils (used dry) which have a little pigment as well as graphite and are very soft on the right paper?
ReplyDeleteCathy and Dory: As you might guess (knowing what a color junkie I am!), I have been thinking a lot about how I might somehow put a bit of color into the graphite sketches. I tried it just a bit the other day (the flowers in one sketch here: http://tina-koyama.blogspot.com/2018/08/hemming-and-hawing-about-paper.html), but I feel the color has to go directly on clean white paper -- any graphite underneath really muddies it. I hadn't thought of Graphitint pencils, though (which, of course, I have! ;-) ). Hmmm. . . Interesting, indeed. Thanks for the ideas! Stay tuned! :-)
ReplyDelete