5/6/12 |
(If you haven’t already, please start with Part 1 of this three-part series of musings on my
sixth anniversary since I started drawing.)
Yesterday I said that I am less frustrated and more likely
to retain and use techniques I’ve learned when they fit into my
already-established style. I hope that didn’t sound like I was saying we
shouldn’t try to learn things that are a stretch or outside our comfort zone.
Indeed, what’s the point of taking a class or reading a book if we are already
doing what is being taught? In addition, when we’re inexperienced, we don’t
really know what we might enjoy doing, so it can be beneficial to explore a
wide variety of things. But if you try enough techniques or materials,
eventually some will “stick” while others don’t.
2/28/12 |
Here’s something I’ve experienced often: I learn an
interesting technique or idea in a book or a workshop. While I’m doing the
exercises, and for a short time afterwards when I’m sketching on my own, I incorporate
the new technique or idea. Eventually, though, I forget about it and go back to
doing my own thing. Even if I haven’t forgotten, it just doesn’t seem to “stick.”
More rarely, I have a different experience: I learn an approach
or an attitude that changes my perspective in some way. An example is Sue Heston’s “sky shapes,” which
changed the way I approach skyline compositions, or Inma Serrano’s way of animating buildings, which made me lose my
fear of drawing architecture. I find that the workshops that tend to stay with
me long-term are those that are less material- or technique-based and more related
to changing my viewpoint while remaining compatible with my style.
To learn a new medium and the specific techniques that go
with it, a typical four-hour or one-day workshop is simply not enough time. I
need the structure and continuity of several consecutive weeks to gain
long-lasting benefit. The courses I’ve taken in pen and ink or colored pencils at Gage are good examples of that.
5/3/12 |
In the last few years when I’ve considered a short workshop,
I’ve chosen instructors more carefully and with certain criteria in mind. I
look for approaches and attitudes more than a new material or technique. I’ve
found that if an instructor has a strongly distinctive style, I look for something
that I can apply to my own way of sketching. If I see work shared online by the
instructor’s students that are simply bad imitations of the instructor’s style,
I avoid those instructors.
In the interest of experimenting, I sometimes try materials
that don’t appeal to me for one reason or another, usually because they are too
messy (charcoal and pastel pencils) or smelly (alcohol-based markers). While I
often like the results, I can’t get past whatever it is about them that repels
me, and they don’t last long in my bag.
Inspired by other urban sketchers, I also sometimes
experiment with materials or tools that I enjoy using but that aren’t conducive
to sketching on location (for example, dip pens and ink). I tell myself, “Well,
if they can use those materials on location, so can I.” But with all the usual
challenges of urban sketching – uncomfortable seating or lack thereof, weather,
changing light, distractions, the weight and bulk of carrying all my stuff – I’ve
learned that I need to minimize further challenges from my materials. I want to
make it as easy as possible to sketch, because then I’m more likely to do it. (Even
watercolors, commonly used by many urban sketchers, eventually proved to be too
cumbersome, and I stopped using them altogether.)
1/27/12 |
All these experiences have led me to believe that it’s
important to use media that I truly enjoy all around – both their use and the results – and that are conducive
to sketching on location. I think I learn more quickly because it’s a pleasure
to practice and experiment without being physically hindered. And while the
materials I use don’t necessarily define
my style, they are part of it, because they are among the many choices I’ve
made that result in the sketch.
This is the end of my brief naval-gazing series on the
occasion of my sixth drawing anniversary. I don’t have any insightful
conclusions from it, but if you can glean some useful nuggets from my process,
then I’m happy for the additional benefit. I’m always interested in hearing
thoughts about your process if you care to share them in the comments. Thank
you for reading!
(Once a year on my sketching anniversary, I write
a retrospective post. You can read the previous years’ posts here: 2016, 2015, 2014, 2013, 2012.)
4/27/12 |
Wonderful blog posts! I have followed some artists on youtube and copied their way of drawing and painting, but when it came to creating my own sketch on the scene, I wasn't able to recreate the look I wanted!
ReplyDeleteThanks for reading along, Cathy!
DeleteGreat series of posts, Tina. For most of it I could say "ditto for me." I'd completely forgotten that September is my anniversary date too. Guess I should have written something too.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Larry! I always think of you around the time of my anniversary because I know you started about the same time!
Delete- Tina
Great job with your musings. As far as learning a new technique or medium, I know doing a short workshop wets my appetite to do something different, but when I am out sketching it is so much easier to go with what I know. Yes, I'll try a few new things but like you say...often they don't "stick." I loved KK's method, but I don't think I did a twig sketch more than twice since I've been home. I guess I'm too much of a creature of habit.
ReplyDeleteThanks for reading along, Joan!
Delete