![]() |
5/20/25 Bryant neighborhood |
Before I began my daily fitness-walking/sketching regimen years ago, I did most of my cold-weather sketching from my mobile studio. Now that most of my urban sketches occur while I’m out on walks, I hardly sketch from my car anymore, but it’s still a handy tool. After picking up a few groceries in the Bryant neighborhood, it was still cool and blustery, so I pulled over and made a sketch exactly like I often used to: Just a random street where I saw some compositional potential.
On my mind was a blog post I had just read by Mark Alan Anderson. Like my composition hero Ian Roberts, Mark believes strongly that even a beautifully executed painting cannot overcome a weak composition. Here’s how he puts it: “It feels like dressing a house with fine furnishings when the foundation is cracked. Back in my ad agency days, we more crudely said it as ‘gold plating a turd.’”
![]() |
Value/compositional study |
He’s also a fan of square compositions. I used my Uglybook to first make a thumbnail composition and value study (at right). Then I pulled out my favorite secondary triad (with the addition of yellow) to execute the “final” version, as if it were a painting. (Typically, I skip the thumbnail step because I consider most of my sketches to be the “final”!)
All of this reminded me of how much I enjoy making small compositional studies just for the sake of studies as I did three years ago for Roberts’ 30-day challenge. I wonder if I can stand to do that again for 30 days – this time all in squares? (I’m just muttering an idea here. . . it’s not a commitment!)
Incidentally, the day I sketched these was my 13th
anniversary since I joined my first Urban Sketchers Seattle outing (which I had
intended to commemorate at our last outing, but forgot). Ever grateful
that I found my tribe, I’ve been happily sketching ever since.