 |
1/13/26 photo reference (Neocolor II and Inktense Blocks in Stillman & Birn Beta sketchbook) |
While I’ve been enjoying experimenting with my values-based palette idea using Caran d’Ache Neocolor II water-soluble crayons, I
remembered a similarly chunky yet radically different product I’ve also enjoyed:
Derwent Inktense Blocks. A few years ago, I played with them enough to learn a bit about their idiosyncrasies, which can be both intriguing and
frustrating. Eventually I grew to like them, even if they are a strange animal.
Sadly, I have rarely used them in the field because they’re
even harder to carry than Neocolor crayons: Though lighter in weight, they are almost
as bulky, and even worse, they break easily. I’ve found, however, that they fit
in the slots of my tiny Peg & Awl Sendak, so I’m hoping they would
be protected if I take them out with me.
As a preliminary trial of a values-based palette, and to
reacquaint myself with Inktense Blocks’ quirks (many of which there are), I made
some sketches from photos. Right off the bat, one difficulty is that the Blocks
range includes very few hues that could be considered light in value – they are
all extremely vibrant and lean toward the darker ranges.
One thing that’s remarkable about the Blocks is that they perform
incomparably when applied dry to wet paper – an explosion of intense color! When
I use that technique with Neocolor II crayons, they do dissolve more completely
than when they are activated on dry paper, but the wax-based binder requires a
bit of scrubbing. The Blocks dissolve thoroughly with very little effort. That’s
not always a good thing – it’s hard to get a subtle effect when I want one –
but the Blocks sure are efficient when I want to cover a large area with solid
color.
For the first sketch (top of post), my reference photo was
taken during one of my golden-hour walks last summer. I had nothing among the
Blocks I own that was light enough for the sky, so I used Neocolor II crayons
for that. I had also been wondering how well Blocks would apply over waxy Neos,
which can act as a resist to some media (such as some colored pencils), so it
was a good test of that. The whole sketch was made dry-on-wet. You can see how
the Neos didn’t dissolve completely (unless I had gone back in and scrubbed
with a brush, which I didn’t), while the Inktense Blocks almost completely
covered the Stillman & Birn Beta sketchbook surface. I had no
problem applying the Blocks over the Neos.
 |
1/14/26 photo reference (Inktense Blocks in Hahnemuhle Akademie Aquarelle sketchbook) |
I used only Inktense Blocks in the second sketch (at right). The house
and front foliage were applied dry, then activated with a brush. I sketched the
trees dry-on-wet.
And hey, if that second scene looks familiar, it should: It’s
the Maple Leaf Mother Grove that I sketched from life a few days ago. If
you’ll recall, I irrationally couldn’t get past my own resistance to using unrealistic
colors for a reportage sketch. Knowing that these trees will likely be cut down,
I had taken some photos, so I had one to use for reference. At the time, I
thought my “real” colors were appropriate, but now I think I like this “unreal”
sketch better. But is it “better” in terms of documenting an event? Am I still honoring the trees if I sketch them in blue and brownish-purple? Hearing myself ask that question, I realize it sounds ridiculous. It’s my sketching of them that honors them, regardless of the colors I use. What do you
think? (My original on-location sketch shown below.)
 |
| 1/13/26 sketched on location |