Pages

Welcome!

Wednesday, May 13, 2026

Abstract Colors, Abstract Shapes

 

4/29/26 Maple Leaf neighborhood (This house, which looks more like a beachfront hotel than a residence, is actually dark brown, but I had no problem turning it blue-violet, which has become a favorite dark in my palette. On the other hand, I felt compelled to color the trees around it in their natural hues.)

As Colin Woodward’s YouTubes have made me think more consciously about abstraction, I’ve come to realize that some types of abstraction come more easily to me than others. The textures and shapes of trees and foliage, for example, are easier to abstract than their hues, which I feel compelled to make as natural as possible (I talked about this a bit in yesterday’s post, too).

On the other hand, humanmade shapes likes houses and cars are more challenging to abstract, but it’s easy to use non-realistic (or non-real) colors to depict them.

5/3/26 Maple Leaf neighborhood (With some difficulty, I tried to abstract the cars as much as possible. The blur of foliage was easier to abstract by simply focusing on values.)

Strangest of all is that it’s easier to abstract both shapes and colors when I work from photo references (as below) than from life. It should all be the same to my brain, yet whenever I sketch from life, I feel I must be more life-like. (As is often the case, my brain can be annoying.)

4/15/26 photo reference (Both shapes and colors are easier to abstract when I draw from a photo)

In somewhat related news: Woodward, a painter in various media, uses many types of “real” brushes (he’s too polite to say, but I can tell that he eschews the waterbrush and keeps one around only for emergency use). One of his favorites is a flat wash brush. Although I have no intention of using real brushes on location, he inspired me to dig out a waterbrush I had hacked several years ago. It’s a standard Kuretake waterbrush with a flat edge that I cut (with some difficulty) at an angle. I goofed around with it at the time to make portraits, then forgot about it.

I’m glad I kept it! The point is finer than a Kuretake medium-size round waterbrush, which is my go-to, and it has come in handy a couple of times for details. More useful, though, is the angled flat edge, which enables activating a large area of foliage, for example, without getting the dreaded dab-dab-dab look that can occur when using a round Kuretake. (In fact, avoiding the dab-dab-dab look was what led me to start using a spritzer to activate foliage years ago.) It might just be a novelty, but I’m keeping it in my bag for now.

2 comments:

  1. In the span of time since my last email, I've come to test waterbrushes from different brands. Thank you for the Kuretake recommendation, I find it the most comfortable in terms of capacity, length, and "squeezeability", plus it seems to keep its point better than some others.

    I have a Tombow which splayed within the week, and I tried to give it a haircut in the same fashion ("dagger"-like). Alas, I was not as successful. It was very difficult to cut the hair evenly, so I ended up with valleys which would trap the pigments unless I press hard on the paper. Not a look I wanted. I still keep it hoping I could find a use, but it's pretty much ruined now.

    The Maple Leaf sketch comes out alright. I actually like the cars.

    - Requiem
    (for some reason the comment box wouldn't let me post a comment with a name)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The nylon that these waterbrushes are made of really is something tough -- I tried every cutting tool I could think of to get through it! Now I'm really going to take care of it so I won't have to hack another!

      Delete